- Bobwhite Manatee Transmission Line
Corridor Selection & Proofing Project [Powerpoint File]
- Slide Breakdown to accompany powerpoint presentation
A secondary task this week was to produce an exaggerated 3D style map based on the georeferenced map I created using ArcScene.
I looked specifically at the case of the DuPage Water Commission
When the commission started looking to GIS an alternative to paper mapping and institutional memory when it came to keeping track of its assets and resources, the established solutions for water utilities were found to be inappropriate. Ultimately, the DWC found a useful model that scaled well to their needs from another industry, the ArcGIS Pipeline Data Model.
To geocode my set of addresses, I ran a geocoding tool in ArcGIS, which correctly placed 68% of the addresses. A 32% miss rate is not acceptable, so I had to look at the addresses that went unmatched and manually locate them (with the help of google maps in this case). I was able to do this successfully with all but one address that seemed to have been misspelled, leaving me with a 95% success rate, which was good enough for the purposes of this exercise.
With my geocoded data, I was then able to use ArcGIS' Network Analyst tool to do some simple routing analysis, creating a route based on three arbitrarily selected road stops. A route was then created that minimized travel time and hit all three stops.
To produce a layer with polygons that met these criteria I used ArcGIS' tools for creating buffers and overlays. Firstly, I created polygon features of buffers around the road and water features, designating the buffers as listed above in the buffer tool. Once I had separate buffer layers for roads and for water features, I was able to use the overlay tool to create a layer based on the intersection of the buffer layers, i.e. another polygon layer that only had features where BOTH buffer layers covered an area. Once I had that, I then used the erase tool to remove any portions of the intersection layer that intersected with anything within the conservation areas feature I was provided.
Ultimately, what I produced amounted to (300 meter buffer around roads) AND (150 meter buffer around lakes/500 meter buffer around rivers) BUT NOT (within conservation area).
Once I had created that feature, representing the most suitable places to camp in the study area, I created a simple map of the area, which is below.
The challenges if this assignment were, firstly to be able to find all of this data. Florida does have GIS clearinghouses online that provide a wealth of GIS data, but searching for particular datasets is still rather tricky. Secondly, all the data needed to be transformed so that all shapefiles and rasters had the same projection coordinate system, and would thereby line up properly.
The search for data was complicated two main factors. First, while GIS datasets themselves are (hopefully) created with a great deal of metadata that lays out important information - such as datums, coordinate systems, dates that the data was collected and so on - the websites that provide searchable indices for data do not themselves have much in the way of search oriented metadata that would make searching for datasets fairly easy. Searching on these sites called to mind search engines from the mid-nineties before Google revolutionized search. Second, learning the jargon based search terms that produce the desired result is a skill that has to be learned. Progress was made on that front, but the bare bones search features provided by data providers is a problem that should be addressed.
The data transformation, by comparison, was relatively easy. All the data collected was based on the same datum, so transformation was fairly straightforward. Once all the data files were assessed as to their extant projection and datum, there were easily transformed.
From there it was simply a matter of creating maps that included all this data. As the assignment was primarily about gathering and preparing data, the cartographic phase of this assignment was slighted to some degree, especially as there were a lot of busy data layers to crowd into three maps.
The resulting map shows all three coordinate sytems' version of Florida and its counties. Four counties were selected, and their areas calculated in each coordinate system in square miles, highlighting the differences between the systems. As two of the systems were created for the north and western portions of Florida (UTM 16 & State Plane Florida, North), they tended to have more distortion of areas calculated for counties in the southeast as compared to those in the northwest of the state.